Volume 5, Issue 3, September 2020, Page: 59-70
Non-market Valuation of Tiya Megalithic World Cultural Heritage of Ethiopia, Application of Travel Cost and Contingent Valuation Methods
Hayatu Mude, Department of Economics, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia
Abebe Belachew, Economic, Social and M&E Consultant, Wolkite, Ethiopia
Mekonnen Bersisa, Department of Economics, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Received: Mar. 21, 2019;       Accepted: Jan. 15, 2020;       Published: Sep. 10, 2020
DOI: 10.11648/j.ajere.20200503.13      View  147      Downloads  79
Abstract
The main purpose of this study is to estimate the total economic value of Tiya megalithic world cultural heritage site using non-market valuation methods of Travel Cost Method (TCM) and Contingent Valuation Method (CVM). The study uses Individual Travel Cost Method to estimate the use value and the Double Bounded Contingent Valuation Method to investigate the mean Willingness to Pay for the nonuse value of the Tiya MWCH site. The truncated Poisson regression method (TPRM) was employed to derive the demand function for the use value of Tiya MWCH site and the bivariate probit model were used to estimate the nonuse value of Tiya MWCH site. The regression result showed that travel cost, monthly income, total travel time, sex, family size, household head, purpose of visit, membership in any environmental group and knowledge are important determinants of the recreational demand of the site. The result of the study also showed that the potential annual use value of the Tiya MWCH site was estimated to be 9,615,508.00 ETB per year and the nonuse value (one time contribution of community residents of Tiya town) of the site is 64,494.20 ETB. Finally, we recommend that to maintenances and maximize the benefits that can be derived from the Tiya MWCH site.
Keywords
Non-market Valuation, Cultural Heritage, Tiya Megalithic Site, Contingent Valuation Method, Individual Travel Cost Method
To cite this article
Hayatu Mude, Abebe Belachew, Mekonnen Bersisa, Non-market Valuation of Tiya Megalithic World Cultural Heritage of Ethiopia, Application of Travel Cost and Contingent Valuation Methods, American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics. Vol. 5, No. 3, 2020, pp. 59-70. doi: 10.11648/j.ajere.20200503.13
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
World Economic Forum, The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2015, vol. 44, no. October. 2015.
[2]
K. Perera, “The Role of Museums in Cultural and Heritage Tourism for Sustainable Economy in Developing Countries Kamani,” Anim. Genet., vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 561–563, 2008.
[3]
S. Akhter, T. S. Yew, and F. P. Studies, “GREENER JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND ACCOUNTANCY Tourists ’ Willingness to Pay for Marine Resource Conservation at Pulau Perhentian Marine Park, Malaysia,” no. 2010, pp. 2354–2357, 2018.
[4]
E. Avrami and R. Mason, “Heritage Values and Challenges of Conservation Planning,” Management Planning for Archaeologial Sites. pp. 13–26, 2000.
[5]
S. Navrud, “Valuing cultural heritage - Lessons learned,” WIT Trans. Built Environ., vol. 83, pp. 95–100, 2005.
[6]
P. Wu and I. Introduction, “Design of an Efficient and Complete Elicitation Decision Process in Contingent Valuation Method : Benefit Evaluation of Kengting National Park in Taiwan Ming-Ta Su II. Theoretical Framework of Benefit Evaluation for National Park 2. 1 Willingness to Pay for the Resources of the Park,” pp. 1–21, 1996.
[7]
P. Breve et al., “Report of the NOAA panel on Contingent Valuation Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation Kenneth Arrow Robert Solow Paul R. Portney Howard Schuman,” no. October 1999, pp. 11–30, 2017, doi: 10.13043/DYS.79.6.
[8]
A. Singh and M. Masuku, “Sampling Techniques & Determination of Sample Size in Applied Statistics Research: an Overview,” Ijecm. Co. Uk, vol. II, no. 11, pp. 1–22, 2014.
[9]
J. M. Bowker and V. R. Leeworthy, “Accounting for ethnicity in recreation demand: A flexible count data approach,” J. Leis. Res., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 64–78, 1998, doi: 10.1080/00222216.1998.11949819.
[10]
T. Haab and K. McConnell, “Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources. The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation. New Horizons in Environmental Economics, Wallace E. Oats and Henk Folmer (Ed. s). Edward Elgar Publishing limited.,” pp. 1–21, 2002, doi: 10.4337/9781843765431.
[11]
C. Cameron and P. Trivedi, “Regression Analysis of Count Data (Econometric Society Monographs),” no. 30, pp. 96–137, 1998, doi: 10.1017/CCOL0521632013.
[12]
H. Bakhshi, D. Fujiwara, R. Lawton, S. Mourato, and P. Dolan, “Measuring Economic Value in Cultural Institutions A report commissioned by the Arts and Humanities Research Council’s Cultural Value Project,” p. 104, 2015.
[13]
A. Alberini, B. Kanninen, and R. T. Carson, “Modeling response incentive effects in dichotomous choice contingent valuation data,” Land Econ., vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 309–324, 1997, doi: 10.2307/3147170.
[14]
M. Hanemann, J. Loomis, and B. Kanninen, “Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation,” Am. J. Agric. Econ., vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 1255–1263, 1991, doi: 10.2307/1242453.
[15]
R. C. Mitchell, “Using Surveys to Value Public Goods,” Using Surv. to Value Public Goods, pp. 7–9, 2013, doi: 10.4324/9781315060569.
[16]
D. J. Maddison and S. Mourato, “by David Maddison and CSERGE Working Paper GEC 99-08,” no. May, 2014, doi: 10.1179/135050301793138182.
[17]
A. Alberini et al., “Modeling Response Incentive Effects in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Data,” vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 309–324, 1997.
Browse journals by subject