Volume 3, Issue 4, December 2018, Page: 40-46
Study on the Decoupling of Forestry Economic Growth Based on Material Flow Accounting
Shan Yongjuan, School of Management Science and Engineering, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang, China
Zhang Ying, School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China
Received: Nov. 20, 2018;       Accepted: Dec. 6, 2018;       Published: Jan. 22, 2019
DOI: 10.11648/j.ajere.20180304.11      View  819      Downloads  100
Abstract
Forestry is endowed with an important role in the construction of ecological civilization, forestry production is the first to rush to realize material input reduction and low emission production. Based on the EW-MFA compilation guide published by the European statistics bureau, the material flow scale of the input-output forestry economic system is calculated. On this basis, the decoupling coefficient of forestry economic growth is studied according to the decoupling theory. The results show that the EKC curve of DMI and the per capita forestry GDP has crossed the inflection point and entered the decline channel; in the input and output side of forestry economic system, forestry economic growth show strong decoupling simultaneously in the year of 1996, 1998 and 2016. If the trend of reduction of material input in forestry production can be maintained, it is estimated that forestry economic growth will enter sustainable development model.
Keywords
Forestry Economic Production, Material Flow Accounting, EKC Curve, Decoupling Analysis
To cite this article
Shan Yongjuan, Zhang Ying, Study on the Decoupling of Forestry Economic Growth Based on Material Flow Accounting, American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics. Vol. 3, No. 4, 2018, pp. 40-46. doi: 10.11648/j.ajere.20180304.11
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Chen Xiao, Zhao Tingting, Guo Yuquan, Song Shengyou. Material input and output analysis of China's economic system [J]. Journal of Peking University (NATURAL SCIENCE EDITION), 2003 (04): 538-547.
[2]
European Commission, Food and Agriculture Organization, International Monetary Fund, et al. System of environmental-economic accounting—central framework [M]. White cover publication, pre-edited text subject to official editing, 2012.
[3]
Eurostat. Economy-Wide Material Flow Accounts and Derived Indicators: A Methodological Guide [R]. European Commission. 2013.
[4]
Giljum S, Dittrich M, Lieber M, et al. Global patterns of material flows and their socio-economic and environmental implications: a MFA study on all countries world-wide from 1980 to 2009 [J]. Resources, 2014, 3(1): 319-339.
[5]
Krausmann, Fridolin & Weisz, Helga & Eisenmenger, Nina & Schütz, Helmut & Haas, Willi & Schaffartzik, Anke. Economy-wide Material Flow Accounting Introduction and Guide Version 1.0. Social Ecology Working Paper.2015 (151).
[6]
Kovanda J, Weinzettel J. Economy‐wide Material Flow Indicators on a Sectoral Level and Strategies for Decreasing Material Inputs of Sectors [J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2017, 21(1): 26-37.
[7]
Li Gang. Material flow analysis of sustainable development of agriculture in China [J]. Journal of Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University (SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION).2014, 14 (4): 55-60.
[8]
Liang Qingqing. Prediction of agricultural carbon emission inflection point and regional comparison based on classical environment EKC curve [J]., technology and economy, 2017,30 (03): 106-110.
[9]
Mayer A, Haas W, Wiedenhofer D. How Countries' Resource Use History Matters for Human Well-being–An Investigation of Global Patterns in Cumulative Material Flows from 1950 to 2010 [J]. Ecological Economics, 2017, 134: 1-10.
[10]
OECD. Sustainable Development: Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressure from economic growth [R]. Pairs: OECD. 2002.
[11]
Tapio P, Banister D, Luukkanev J, et al. Energy and transport in comparison: immaterialisation, dematerialisation and decarbonisation in the EU15 between 1970 and 2000 [J]. Energy policy, 2007,35(1): 433-451.
[12]
Zhou Yinxiang. Study on Decoupling and Coupling Relations between Transportation Carbon Emissions and Industry Economic Growth Based on Tapio Decoupling Model and Co-integration Theory [J]. Exploration of Economic Issues, 2016 (06): 41-48.
[13]
Xia Yong, Zhong Mao Chu. Can environmental regulation promote economic growth and environmental pollution decoupling? - An Empirical Analysis Based on industrial SO2 emission data of 271 cities in China [J]. business economy and management, 2016 (11): 69-78.
[14]
Yu Feng. Review and Evaluation of Environmental Kuznets Curve [J]. Exploration of Economic Issues, 2006 (08): 4-12.
[15]
Zhang Jianguo. Forest Ecology Economics [M]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University Press. 1995:15-34.
Browse journals by subject